GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SHUKANBHAI CHHANABHAI VASAVA — 1013/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH080010962026

Filing Number

1013/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1013/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199059260091

Police Station

JHAGADIYA GIDC POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHUKANBHAI CHHANABHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Shukanbhai Chhanabhai Vasava (1013/2026) The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act and imposed a sentence of imprisonment until the court's rising plus a fine of ₹100, with five days simple imprisonment as default. The court considered the accused's plea of guilt, his impoverished background, family responsibilities, and circumstances leading to the offense, and exercised discretion to impose a lighter sentence than the minimum prescribed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1013/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Shukanbhai Chhanabhai Vasava (1013/2026) The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act and imposed a sentence of imprisonment until the court's rising plus a fine of ₹100, with five days simple imprisonment as default. The court considered the accused's plea of guilt, his impoverished background, family responsibilities, and circumstances leading to the offense, and exercised discretion to impose a lighter sentence than the minimum prescribed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case