GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SARJANABEN SANMUKHBHAI VASAVA — 1012/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH080010952026

Filing Number

1012/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1012/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199059260118

Police Station

JHAGADIYA GIDC POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SARJANABEN SANMUKHBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act, finding her guilty of an offense related to illicit liquor. Considering her socio-economic status, lack of prior criminal history, and voluntary confession, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine or five days simple imprisonment in default, rather than the maximum punishment available. The judgment emphasized mitigating circumstances while maintaining accountability for the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1012/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act, finding her guilty of an offense related to illicit liquor. Considering her socio-economic status, lack of prior criminal history, and voluntary confession, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine or five days simple imprisonment in default, rather than the maximum punishment available. The judgment emphasized mitigating circumstances while maintaining accountability for the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case