GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SUMITRABEN RANACHHODBHAI VASAVA — 1011/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH080010942026

Filing Number

1011/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1011/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199059260119

Police Station

JHAGADIYA GIDC POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUMITRABEN RANACHHODBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Sumitraben Ranachhodbhai Vasava (1011/2026) The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act and sentenced her to imprisonment until the court rises plus a fine of Rs. 100, with five days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. The court considered the accused's plea of guilty, her socioeconomic circumstances as a poor woman with family responsibilities, and applied lenient sentencing principles to impose a lighter punishment than statutory maximums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1011/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Sumitraben Ranachhodbhai Vasava (1011/2026) The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act and sentenced her to imprisonment until the court rises plus a fine of Rs. 100, with five days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. The court considered the accused's plea of guilty, her socioeconomic circumstances as a poor woman with family responsibilities, and applied lenient sentencing principles to impose a lighter punishment than statutory maximums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case