GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs YOGESHBHAI THAKORBHAI VASAVA — 1010/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH080010932026

Filing Number

1010/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1010/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199059260078

Police Station

JHAGADIYA GIDC POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.YOGESHBHAI THAKORBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Yogeshbhai Thakorbhai Vasava under the Prohibition Act and sentenced him to imprisonment for a period already served plus a fine of Rs. 100, with an additional five-day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's plea of guilt, impoverished background, family responsibilities, and lack of inducement in imposing lenient punishment below the statutory minimum, citing relevant precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1010/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Yogeshbhai Thakorbhai Vasava under the Prohibition Act and sentenced him to imprisonment for a period already served plus a fine of Rs. 100, with an additional five-day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's plea of guilt, impoverished background, family responsibilities, and lack of inducement in imposing lenient punishment below the statutory minimum, citing relevant precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case