GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs KRISHNABEN MITALBHAI VASAVA — 994/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH080010752026

Filing Number

994/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

994/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199059260034

Police Station

JHAGADIYA GIDC POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNABEN MITALBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Krishnaben Mitalbhai Vasava under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire) and sentenced her to imprisonment until the rising of court plus a fine of Rs. 100, with simple imprisonment as alternative if fine remains unpaid. The court found the accused had voluntarily admitted guilt and, considering the established legal principles and facts of the case, imposed the sentence in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 994/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Krishnaben Mitalbhai Vasava under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire) and sentenced her to imprisonment until the rising of court plus a fine of Rs. 100, with simple imprisonment as alternative if fine remains unpaid. The court found the accused had voluntarily admitted guilt and, considering the established legal principles and facts of the case, imposed the sentence in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case