GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs REKHABEN MAHESHBHAI SHAH — 966/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH080010472026

Filing Number

966/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

966/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199059260035

Police Station

JHAGADIYA GIDC POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REKHABEN MAHESHBHAI SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Rekhaben Maheshbhai Shah under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire) and sentenced her to imprisonment until the date of hearing plus a fine of ₹100, with simple imprisonment for one day as default punishment. The court found the accused had voluntarily admitted to the offense and, considering the principles established in prior precedent along with the nature of the crime and the accused's circumstances, imposed the sentence deemed just and appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 966/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Rekhaben Maheshbhai Shah under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire) and sentenced her to imprisonment until the date of hearing plus a fine of ₹100, with simple imprisonment for one day as default punishment. The court found the accused had voluntarily admitted to the offense and, considering the principles established in prior precedent along with the nature of the crime and the accused's circumstances, imposed the sentence deemed just and appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case