GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs JIGNESHBHAI HIRABHAI PATEL — 452/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH080005132026

Filing Number

452/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

452/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199028250827

Police Station

JHAGADIA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JIGNESHBHAI HIRABHAI PATEL

  2. 2.KISHNBHAI KANCHANBHAI VASAVA

  3. 3.DALASUKHBHAI PARASOTAMBHAI VASAVA

  4. 4.SACHINBHAI VAJESINGBHAI VASAVA

  5. 5.GOVINDBHAI FATESINGBHAI PARAMAR

  6. 6.MAHENDRABHAI JIVANBHAI VASAVA

  7. 7.HARESHBHAI MANILAL VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 for gambling, finding sufficient evidence of their involvement in an illegal gambling operation where cash and gaming materials were recovered. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of Rs. 2,100 with two days' simple imprisonment as an alternative, considering mitigating factors such as their first offense status, poverty, and dependents, while ordering confiscation of the seized amount and vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 452/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 for gambling, finding sufficient evidence of their involvement in an illegal gambling operation where cash and gaming materials were recovered. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of Rs. 2,100 with two days' simple imprisonment as an alternative, considering mitigating factors such as their first offense status, poverty, and dependents, while ordering confiscation of the seized amount and vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case