GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs JIGNESHBHAI HIRABHAI PATEL — 452/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH080005132026

Case disposed

Filing Number

452/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

452/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199028250827

Police Station

JHAGADIA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PREVENTION OF GAMBLING ACT, 1887 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

JIGNESHBHAI HIRABHAI PATEL

KISHNBHAI KANCHANBHAI VASAVA

DALASUKHBHAI PARASOTAMBHAI VASAVA

SACHINBHAI VAJESINGBHAI VASAVA

GOVINDBHAI FATESINGBHAI PARAMAR

MAHENDRABHAI JIVANBHAI VASAVA

HARESHBHAI MANILAL VASAVA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

16-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 for gambling, finding sufficient evidence of their involvement in an illegal gambling operation where cash and gaming materials were recovered. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of Rs. 2,100 with two days' simple imprisonment as an alternative, considering mitigating factors such as their first offense status, poverty, and dependents, while ordering confiscation of the seized amount and vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 for gambling, finding sufficient evidence of their involvement in an illegal gambling operation where cash and gaming materials were recovered. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of Rs. 2,100 with two days' simple imprisonment as an alternative, considering mitigating factors such as their first offense status, poverty, and dependents, while ordering confiscation of the seized amount and vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case