GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAKESHBHAI MANAJIBHAI BHABHOR Advocate - N R PANCHAL — 147/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,106(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH080001952025

Filing Number

147/2025

Filing Date

04-Feb-2025

Registration No

147/2025

Registration Date

04-Feb-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199028240957

Police Station

JHAGADIA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,106(1)
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAKESHBHAI MANAJIBHAI BHABHOR Advocate - N R PANCHAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 147/2025 Court Decision: The accused (Rakeshbhai Manajibhai Bhabhor) is acquitted of charges under IPC Section 281, 106(1), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184. The court found insufficient credible evidence from witnesses to prove the accused recklessly operated a tractor that caused a fatal accident. While the prosecution established a prima facie case, critical witness testimonies lacked consistency and corroboration, leaving reasonable doubt about the accused's culpability. Key Reasoning: The court emphasized that for conviction, evidence must be strong, clear, and reliable rather than merely suspicious. Multiple witnesses contradicted each other, CCTV footage was unavailable, and investigation procedures were incomplete, making it unsafe to convict solely on circumstantial evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 13-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 01-May-2026

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 15-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 25-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 19-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 27-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 04-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 147/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 147/2025 Court Decision: The accused (Rakeshbhai Manajibhai Bhabhor) is acquitted of charges under IPC Section 281, 106(1), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184. The court found insufficient credible evidence from witnesses to prove the accused recklessly operated a tractor that caused a fatal accident. While the prosecution established a prima facie case, critical witness testimonies lacked consistency and corroboration, leaving reasonable doubt about the accused's culpability. Key Reasoning: The court emphasized that for conviction, evidence must be strong, clear, and reliable rather than merely suspicious. Multiple witnesses contradicted each other, CCTV footage was unavailable, and investigation procedures were incomplete, making it unsafe to convict solely on circumstantial evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case