JAYANTIBHAI RESHMABHAI VASAVA vs BACHIBEN WD/O HIRABHAI NAGLABHAI VASAVA — 48/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 009. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBH080001672018

Filing Number

48/2018

Filing Date

31-Jan-2018

Registration No

48/2018

Registration Date

28-Sep-2016

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 009

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYANTIBHAI RESHMABHAI VASAVA

    Adv. N.C.GODIGAJBAR

  2. 2.MADHUBEN D/O RESHMABHAI MOTIYA VASAVA

  3. 3.HARESH MAHENDRA VASAVA

  4. 4.SONALBEN MAHENDRA VASAVA

  5. 5.AMBANEN RESHMABHAI VASAVA

  6. 6.BABUBHAI RESHMABHAI VASAVA

  7. 7.KAILASHBEN D/O RESHMA VASAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BACHIBEN WD/O HIRABHAI NAGLABHAI VASAVA

  2. 2.BACHUBHAI HIRABHAI VASAVA

  3. 3.MANGIBNE WD/O VALJI NAGLA VASAVA

  4. 4.BUDHIYABHAI VALJI VASAVA

  5. 5.SHRADHABEN RAMANBHAI VALJI VASAVA

  6. 6.CHAMPABEN VALJIBHAI VASAVA

  7. 7.SUKTIBEN WD/O CHANDUBHAI VALJIBHAI

  8. 8.MANTABEN VALJIBHAI VASAVA

  9. 9.SUKHIBEN VALJIBHAI VASAVA

  10. 10.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

  11. 11.COLLECTOR SHRI, BHARUCH

  12. 12.MAMLATDAR SHRI, JHAGADIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 48/2018 Court Decision: The Principal Senior Civil Court, Jhagadia dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for lack of merit. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their claim to agricultural land or demonstrate entitlement to the relief sought. Key Reasoning: The court determined that while a registered sale deed existed from 1971, the plaintiffs could not prove continuous possession or valid inheritance rights to the disputed property. Critical deficiencies included the absence of proper revenue records, failure to maintain the sale deed according to law, and lack of evidence that the original seller (Reshma) had actually transferred ownership to the plaintiffs' predecessors. The court noted that a 25-year gap without any action to enforce the sale deed, combined with the failure to update land records, rendered the plaintiffs' claims untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 26-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 19-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 04-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 04-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 04-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 09-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 30-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 21-Jul-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 03-May-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 21-Mar-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 18-Jan-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 25-Nov-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 27-Sep-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 02-Aug-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 12-Jun-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 05-Apr-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 09-Feb-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 22-Dec-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 03-Nov-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 15-Sep-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  30. 26-Jul-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  31. 12-Jun-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  32. 05-May-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  33. 18-Mar-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  34. 01-Feb-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  35. 06-Jan-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  36. 25-Nov-2022

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  37. 30-Sep-2022

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  38. 22-Aug-2022

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  39. 04-Jul-2022

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  40. 09-May-2022

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  41. 19-Apr-2022

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  42. 19-Mar-2022

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  43. 21-Feb-2022

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  44. 21-Jan-2022

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  45. 09-Dec-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  46. 25-Nov-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  47. 08-Oct-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  48. 13-Aug-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  49. 16-Jul-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  50. 18-Jun-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  51. 08-Apr-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  52. 24-Feb-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  53. 06-Jan-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  54. 11-Nov-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  55. 23-Sep-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  56. 29-Aug-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  57. 20-Jun-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  58. 02-May-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  59. 21-Mar-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  60. 15-Feb-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  61. 18-Jan-2020

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  62. 07-Dec-2019

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  63. 05-Oct-2019

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  64. 31-Aug-2019

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  65. 06-Jul-2019

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  66. 20-Apr-2019

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  67. 16-Feb-2019

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  68. 19-Jan-2019

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  69. 15-Dec-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  70. 20-Oct-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  71. 15-Sep-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  72. 04-Aug-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  73. 30-Jun-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  74. 12-Jun-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  75. 04-May-2018

    Rejoinder

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  76. 05-Apr-2018

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  77. 26-Feb-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  78. 31-Jan-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 48/2018 Court Decision: The Principal Senior Civil Court, Jhagadia dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for lack of merit. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their claim to agricultural land or demonstrate entitlement to the relief sought. Key Reasoning: The court determined that while a registered sale deed existed from 1971, the plaintiffs could not prove continuous possession or valid inheritance rights to the disputed property. Critical deficiencies included the absence of proper revenue records, failure to maintain the sale deed according to law, and lack of evidence that the original seller (Reshma) had actually transferred ownership to the plaintiffs' predecessors. The court noted that a 25-year gap without any action to enforce the sale deed, combined with the failure to update land records, rendered the plaintiffs' claims untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case