VIJAYSINH AMARASINH SOLANKI vs MAHIJIBHAI CHHAGANBHAI MANORBHAI HEIR KASHIBEN D/O MAHIJIBHAI W/O SOMABHAI JIBHAI — 13/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,4. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 02nd May 2026.
CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU
CNR: GJBH070014042025
Filing Number
13/2025
Filing Date
17-Sep-2025
Registration No
13/2025
Registration Date
17-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, AMOD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
02-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 09-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAYSINH AMARASINH SOLANKI
Adv. V J PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHIJIBHAI CHHAGANBHAI MANORBHAI HEIR KASHIBEN D/O MAHIJIBHAI W/O SOMABHAI JIBHAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Principal Civil Judge, Amod rejected the applicant's application to set aside the dismissal of Civil Suit 07/2021 under Order IX Rule 4 of the CPC. The court found that the plaintiff failed to produce evidence for nearly three years without demonstrating sufficient cause, and held that the plaintiff's excuse of advocate illness and potential hardship cannot justify non-production of evidence when due diligence was lacking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Feb-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jan-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Dec-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Oct-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 13/2025
Summary: The Principal Civil Judge, Amod rejected the applicant's application to set aside the dismissal of Civil Suit 07/2021 under Order IX Rule 4 of the CPC. The court found that the plaintiff failed to produce evidence for nearly three years without demonstrating sufficient cause, and held that the plaintiff's excuse of advocate illness and potential hardship cannot justify non-production of evidence when due diligence was lacking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts