Government of Gujarat vs MUNIR URFE MUNNO MUSABHAI MOJIYA VORA PATEL — 679/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH070007392022
Filing Number
679/2022
Filing Date
04-04-2022
Registration No
679/2022
Registration Date
04-04-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, AMOD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
123
Police Station
AMOD POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MUNIR URFE MUNNO MUSABHAI MOJIYA VORA PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 06-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 03-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C. No. 679/2022 Court Decision: The accused Munir Urfe Munno Musabhai Mojiya Vora Patel was acquitted under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2) and GP Act Section 135 due to insufficient evidence. The complainant failed to establish the allegations of assault and threats beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found the complainant's testimony contradictory—during cross-examination, he admitted to normal conversation with the accused regarding cricket and denied being struck with a wooden stick or threatened with death. Medical evidence and circumstantial facts did not corroborate the complaint, leading to the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C. No. 679/2022 Court Decision: The accused Munir Urfe Munno Musabhai Mojiya Vora Patel was acquitted under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2) and GP Act Section 135 due to insufficient evidence. The complainant failed to establish the allegations of assault and threats beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found the complainant's testimony contradictory—during cross-examination, he admitted to normal conversation with the accused regarding cricket and denied being struck with a wooden stick or threatened with death. Medical evidence and circumstantial facts did not corroborate the complaint, leading to the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts