Government of Gujarat vs SANJAYBHAI JITUBHAI RATHOD — 179/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH070001972026
Filing Number
179/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
179/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, AMOD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199003250060
Police Station
AMOD POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANJAYBHAI JITUBHAI RATHOD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 179/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted defendant Sanjaybhai Jitubhai Rathod of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b) and 85, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that although police found the defendant in an intoxicated state on 31/01/2025, the absence of proper blood sample testing (Form-C from the testing laboratory as required by Bombay Prohibition Rules 1959) and lack of expert medical testimony meant the prosecution could not conclusively establish illegal alcohol consumption, rendering the charge unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 179/2026
Summary of Case 179/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted defendant Sanjaybhai Jitubhai Rathod of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b) and 85, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that although police found the defendant in an intoxicated state on 31/01/2025, the absence of proper blood sample testing (Form-C from the testing laboratory as required by Bombay Prohibition Rules 1959) and lack of expert medical testimony meant the prosecution could not conclusively establish illegal alcohol consumption, rendering the charge unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts