Government of Gujarat vs RAMILABEN W/O MULJIBHAI BABUBHAI VASAVA — 168/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH070001862026

Filing Number

168/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

168/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, AMOD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199003250660

Police Station

AMOD POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMILABEN W/O MULJIBHAI BABUBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 168/2026 The court acquitted Ramilaben of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), for alleged illegal possession of 4 liters of country liquor without permit on 13/10/2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as crucial evidence including FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) testing reports and independent witness statements were absent, and all evidence relied solely on police testimony. The court granted the accused the benefit of doubt and ordered her acquittal with bail conditions maintained pending any appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 168/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 168/2026 The court acquitted Ramilaben of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), for alleged illegal possession of 4 liters of country liquor without permit on 13/10/2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as crucial evidence including FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) testing reports and independent witness statements were absent, and all evidence relied solely on police testimony. The court granted the accused the benefit of doubt and ordered her acquittal with bail conditions maintained pending any appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case