Government of Gujarat vs SANGITABEN SHAILESHBHAI JADAV — 118/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH070001282026

Filing Number

118/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

118/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, AMOD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199003250476

Police Station

AMOD POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANGITABEN SHAILESHBHAI JADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    The court acquitted defendant Sangitaben Shaileshbhai Jadav of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of forensic laboratory testing of the seized liquid and reliance solely on police testimony. The court granted benefit of doubt to the accused, ordering her release and maintaining her existing bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 14-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 118/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted defendant Sangitaben Shaileshbhai Jadav of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of forensic laboratory testing of the seized liquid and reliance solely on police testimony. The court granted benefit of doubt to the accused, ordering her release and maintaining her existing bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case