Government of Gujarat vs DEVENDRABHAI JAYANTIBHAI VASAVA — 116/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH070001262026
Filing Number
116/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
116/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, AMOD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199003250253
Police Station
AMOD POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEVENDRABHAI JAYANTIBHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Judegement
Summary: Case 116/2026 - Government of Gujarat v. Devendrabhai Jayantibhai Vasava The court acquitted the accused Devendrabhai Jayantibhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and 85. The investigating officer testified he was not an alcohol expert and failed to prepare the mandatory Form "C" test report, and the blood sample was not sent to the testing laboratory within the prescribed seven-day period under the Bombay Prohibition Rules 1959, rendering the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 116/2026
Summary: Case 116/2026 - Government of Gujarat v. Devendrabhai Jayantibhai Vasava The court acquitted the accused Devendrabhai Jayantibhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and 85. The investigating officer testified he was not an alcohol expert and failed to prepare the mandatory Form "C" test report, and the blood sample was not sent to the testing laboratory within the prescribed seven-day period under the Bombay Prohibition Rules 1959, rendering the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts