Government of Gujarat vs SANKARBHAI SOMABHAI SALAT — 114/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH070001242026
Filing Number
114/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
114/2026
Registration Date
06-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, AMOD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199003250541
Police Station
AMOD POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SANKARBHAI SOMABHAI SALAT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 06-04-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 14-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Sankarbhai Somabhai Salat (Case 114/2026) The court acquitted the defendant of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing and intending to sell 3 liters of illicit country liquor worth ₹600. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as no laboratory testing report was submitted to confirm the confiscated liquid was actually an intoxicating substance, and all evidence came solely from police witnesses without independent corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Sankarbhai Somabhai Salat (Case 114/2026) The court acquitted the defendant of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing and intending to sell 3 liters of illicit country liquor worth ₹600. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as no laboratory testing report was submitted to confirm the confiscated liquid was actually an intoxicating substance, and all evidence came solely from police witnesses without independent corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts