Government of Gujarat vs SUMANBEN THAKORBHAI VASAVA — 111/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH070001212026

Filing Number

111/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

111/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, AMOD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199003250278

Police Station

AMOD POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUMANBEN THAKORBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 111/2026 The Amod Judicial Magistrate convicted Sumanben Thakorbhai Vasava under Section 65(a)(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2017, after she pleaded guilty to the narcotic offense. Considering this was her first offense, her poor economic circumstances as a daily laborer, and citing relevant High Court precedents on sentencing principles, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine with five days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 111/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 111/2026 The Amod Judicial Magistrate convicted Sumanben Thakorbhai Vasava under Section 65(a)(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2017, after she pleaded guilty to the narcotic offense. Considering this was her first offense, her poor economic circumstances as a daily laborer, and citing relevant High Court precedents on sentencing principles, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine with five days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case