ANIS YUNUS CHHADAD vs EKARAM MUSA DAMKIWALA Advocate - M U PATEL — 14/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH070000232024

Filing Number

14/2024

Filing Date

10-Jan-2024

Registration No

14/2024

Registration Date

10-Jan-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, AMOD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIS YUNUS CHHADAD

    Adv. V J PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.EKARAM MUSA DAMKIWALA Advocate - M U PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 14/2024 Summary: The court acquitted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties reached a settlement. The petitioner claimed ₹7,00,000 from the accused; ₹4,00,000 was paid in cash and the remaining ₹3,00,000 via an HDFC Bank cheque dated 31/12/2026. Following the settlement and withdrawal of proceedings, the court discharged the accused and dismissed the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 10-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 04-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 23-Sep-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 19-Aug-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 12-Jul-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 23-Jun-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 06-Jun-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 25-Apr-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 28-Feb-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 10-Jan-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 13-Dec-2024

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 11-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 31-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 07-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 25-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 11-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 26-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 21-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 30-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 04-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 08-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 10-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 14/2024 Summary: The court acquitted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties reached a settlement. The petitioner claimed ₹7,00,000 from the accused; ₹4,00,000 was paid in cash and the remaining ₹3,00,000 via an HDFC Bank cheque dated 31/12/2026. Following the settlement and withdrawal of proceedings, the court discharged the accused and dismissed the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case