ANIS YUNUS CHHADAD vs EKARAM MUSA DAMKIWALA Advocate - M U PATEL — 14/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH070000232024
Filing Number
14/2024
Filing Date
10-01-2024
Registration No
14/2024
Registration Date
10-01-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, AMOD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANIS YUNUS CHHADAD
Adv. V J PATEL
Respondent(s)
EKARAM MUSA DAMKIWALA Advocate - M U PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 09-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 14/2024 Summary: The court acquitted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties reached a settlement. The petitioner claimed ₹7,00,000 from the accused; ₹4,00,000 was paid in cash and the remaining ₹3,00,000 via an HDFC Bank cheque dated 31/12/2026. Following the settlement and withdrawal of proceedings, the court discharged the accused and dismissed the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 14/2024 Summary: The court acquitted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties reached a settlement. The petitioner claimed ₹7,00,000 from the accused; ₹4,00,000 was paid in cash and the remaining ₹3,00,000 via an HDFC Bank cheque dated 31/12/2026. Following the settlement and withdrawal of proceedings, the court discharged the accused and dismissed the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts