Government of Gujarat vs TASLIM ALIAS SULATAN SIKANDAR SHEKH Advocate - Y G MALEK — 1796/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH060025522025
Filing Number
1796/2025
Filing Date
01-Dec-2025
Registration No
1796/2025
Registration Date
01-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMBUSAR
Judge
2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 09-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199027250474
Police Station
JAMBUSAR POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.TASLIM ALIAS SULATAN SIKANDAR SHEKH Advocate - Y G MALEK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Taslim Alias Sulatan Sikandar Shekh (1796/2025) The court acquitted the accused Taslim of charges under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for alleged illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient evidence due to procedural irregularities in the investigation, including defective panchnama (official record) preparation and lack of proper witness authentication. The court imposed Rs. 25,000 fine with confiscation of seized property, but benefit of doubt was given regarding the substantive criminal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1796/2025
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Taslim Alias Sulatan Sikandar Shekh (1796/2025) The court acquitted the accused Taslim of charges under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for alleged illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient evidence due to procedural irregularities in the investigation, including defective panchnama (official record) preparation and lack of proper witness authentication. The court imposed Rs. 25,000 fine with confiscation of seized property, but benefit of doubt was given regarding the substantive criminal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts