JUBEDA ABDULKADAR AHAMAD PATEL vs MEHRUNISHA ABDUL HAKK ADAM (SANTOSHI NAGAR) Advocate - S Y CHOKIWALA — 85/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 15. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 25-Jun-2026

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBH060017882023

Filing Number

85/2023

Filing Date

11-Jul-2023

Registration No

85/2023

Registration Date

11-Jul-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMBUSAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 15

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JUBEDA ABDULKADAR AHAMAD PATEL

    Adv. Y M PATEL

  2. 2.MEHRUNISHA ABDULAKADAR AHMAD PATEL

  3. 3.YUSUF ABDULKADAR AHMAD PATEL

  4. 4.YUNUS ABDULKADAR AHMAD PATEL

  5. 5.YASIN ABDULKADAR AHAMAD PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MEHRUNISHA ABDUL HAKK ADAM (SANTOSHI NAGAR) Advocate - S Y CHOKIWALA

  2. 2.GULAM ILYAS ABDUL ISHA (PATEL)

    Adv. S Y CHOKIWALA

  3. 3.FAIZAL GULAM ILYAS ABDUL (PATEL)

    Adv. S Y CHOKIWALA

  4. 4.SADIK ISE MAHAMAD FAFAR

    Adv. S Y CHOKIWALA

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 85/2023 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for interim injunction against the defendants. Key Facts: The plaintiffs (legal heirs of deceased Abdul Kadar Ahmed Patel) sought specific performance of a sale agreement dated 07.11.1992 and injunction to prevent defendants from interfering with agricultural land in Bharuch district. The defendants contested the claim, asserting independent ownership since 1973-77 and arguing the suit was filed 31 years after contract execution, barring it under the Statute of Limitations. They also challenged the document's authenticity, claiming forged signatures. Court's Reasoning: The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish the three essential elements for granting interim injunction: (i) prima facie case, (ii) balance of convenience, and (iii) irreparable loss. The court noted the unregistered sale agreement, lack of documentary evidence proving possession, absence of court commission application to verify actual possession, and the significant delay in filing suit all weighed against the plaintiffs' claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 22-Dec-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 01-Dec-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 04-Nov-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 13-Oct-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 16-Sep-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 26-Aug-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 04-Aug-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 22-Jul-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 27-Jun-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 20-Jun-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 06-Jun-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 03-Jun-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 31-May-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 30-May-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 21-May-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 14-May-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 29-Apr-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 22-Apr-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 16-Apr-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 21-Mar-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  30. 15-Feb-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  31. 30-Jan-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  32. 02-Jan-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  33. 21-Nov-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  34. 19-Oct-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  35. 26-Sep-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  36. 22-Aug-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  37. 18-Jul-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  38. 05-Jul-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  39. 18-May-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  40. 19-Apr-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  41. 23-Feb-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  42. 19-Jan-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  43. 25-Nov-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  44. 21-Oct-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  45. 22-Sep-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  46. 11-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 11-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 85/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 85/2023 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for interim injunction against the defendants. Key Facts: The plaintiffs (legal heirs of deceased Abdul Kadar Ahmed Patel) sought specific performance of a sale agreement dated 07.11.1992 and injunction to prevent defendants from interfering with agricultural land in Bharuch district. The defendants contested the claim, asserting independent ownership since 1973-77 and arguing the suit was filed 31 years after contract execution, barring it under the Statute of Limitations. They also challenged the document's authenticity, claiming forged signatures. Court's Reasoning: The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish the three essential elements for granting interim injunction: (i) prima facie case, (ii) balance of convenience, and (iii) irreparable loss. The court noted the unregistered sale agreement, lack of documentary evidence proving possession, absence of court commission application to verify actual possession, and the significant delay in filing suit all weighed against the plaintiffs' claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case