SAMIR IQBAL MALEK vs VAHIDBHAI BASHIRBHAI BHATTHI Advocate - J G PATEL — 980/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH060014292025

Filing Number

980/2025

Filing Date

11-Jul-2025

Registration No

980/2025

Registration Date

11-Jul-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMBUSAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMIR IQBAL MALEK

    Adv. M U PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VAHIDBHAI BASHIRBHAI BHATTHI Advocate - J G PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 980/2025 Court Decision: The Junagadh Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted defendant Vahidbhai Bashirbhai Bhatti under the Negotiable Instrument Act Section 138 (bounced cheque offense) and sentenced him to 3 months imprisonment plus a fine of ₹1,00,000 with additional imprisonment of 1 month if fine is unpaid. The court also ordered compensation of ₹1,70,000 to be returned to petitioner Samir Iqbal Malek. Key Facts: Defendant issued a cheque for ₹1,70,000 to the petitioner on 30.04.2025 as repayment of an advance loan, but the cheque was dishonored due to insufficient funds. Despite legal notice, defendant failed to make payment, constituting criminal breach of trust. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 18-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 10-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 21-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 07-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 12-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 01-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 30-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 11-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 980/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 980/2025 Court Decision: The Junagadh Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted defendant Vahidbhai Bashirbhai Bhatti under the Negotiable Instrument Act Section 138 (bounced cheque offense) and sentenced him to 3 months imprisonment plus a fine of ₹1,00,000 with additional imprisonment of 1 month if fine is unpaid. The court also ordered compensation of ₹1,70,000 to be returned to petitioner Samir Iqbal Malek. Key Facts: Defendant issued a cheque for ₹1,70,000 to the petitioner on 30.04.2025 as repayment of an advance loan, but the cheque was dishonored due to insufficient funds. Despite legal notice, defendant failed to make payment, constituting criminal breach of trust. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case