BALADEVBHAI CHHOTUBHAI SOLANKI vs HEMANTBHAI KARSHANBHAI PATEL Advocate - R R PATHAN — 6/2025

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU

CNR: GJBH060009402025

Filing Number

6/2025

Filing Date

27-Jun-2025

Registration No

6/2025

Registration Date

27-Jun-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMBUSAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALADEVBHAI CHHOTUBHAI SOLANKI

    Adv. M N MALETE

  2. 2.MUKESHBHAI CHHOTUBHAAI SOLANKI

  3. 3.HARSHADBHAI SHASHIKANTBHAI NIZAMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HEMANTBHAI KARSHANBHAI PATEL Advocate - R R PATHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: CMA No. 6/2025 The court rejected the applicants' plea to condone a four-month delay in filing a restoration application for their dismissed specific performance suit (Sp.C.S. No. 10/2018). While the applicants claimed the delay resulted from their original counsel's death and subsequent document recovery, the court found this explanation unjustifiable, noting the plaintiffs were aware of counsel's death by January 2024, obtained a new advocate, yet took no further action until after the suit's dismissal on 17.01.2025. The court emphasized the applicants had ample opportunities over seven years since filing to adduce evidence but remained absent and disengaged throughout proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-May-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 05-May-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 28-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 06-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 23-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 03-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 02-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 25-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 24-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 18-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 16-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 10-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 19-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 08-Dec-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 15-Nov-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 04-Oct-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 01-Sep-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 24-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 27-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMA No. 6/2025 The court rejected the applicants' plea to condone a four-month delay in filing a restoration application for their dismissed specific performance suit (Sp.C.S. No. 10/2018). While the applicants claimed the delay resulted from their original counsel's death and subsequent document recovery, the court found this explanation unjustifiable, noting the plaintiffs were aware of counsel's death by January 2024, obtained a new advocate, yet took no further action until after the suit's dismissal on 17.01.2025. The court emphasized the applicants had ample opportunities over seven years since filing to adduce evidence but remained absent and disengaged throughout proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case