CHANCHALBEN WD/O CHHATRASANG PARMAR vs BHARAT FATESANG PARMAR LEGAL HEIRS OF FATESANG RAYSANG Advocate - N H PATEL — 20/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 15. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th June 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBH060002392019

Filing Number

20/2019

Filing Date

25-Jan-2019

Registration No

20/2019

Registration Date

25-Jan-2019

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMBUSAR

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 15

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANCHALBEN WD/O CHHATRASANG PARMAR

    Adv. S I DOLA

  2. 2.AJITBHAI CHHATRASANG PARMAR

  3. 3.KIRANBHAI CHHATRASANG PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARAT FATESANG PARMAR LEGAL HEIRS OF FATESANG RAYSANG Advocate - N H PATEL

  2. 2.BHIMSANG BHAGAVAN PARMAR

    Adv. N H PATEL

  3. 3.AMARASANG UDESANG PARMAR

    Adv. N H PATEL

  4. 4.BUDHIYABHAI BHAGAVANBHAI PARMAR

  5. 5.RAMANBHAI BHAGAVANBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Jun-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 20/2019 Court Decision: The court dismissed the petitioners' (Chanchalben and her sons) suit for declaration of ownership and partition of ancestral agricultural land in Kahanva village, Jambusur taluka, Bharuch district. The court found that the petitioners failed to prove their claims regarding inheritance rights to a 1/3 share in property allegedly belonging to Raysang Ramsang Parmar, as the division of ancestral property was allegedly done orally without documented evidence. Key Reasoning: The petitioners could not establish the ancestral property's ownership, the claimed oral partition, or their 1/3 inheritance share through credible evidence. The court noted missing necessary parties to the suit and concluded that without proper pleadings and substantiation regarding the property's division, the claim for judicial declaration and possession could not succeed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 24-Jun-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Jun-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 14-May-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 29-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 09-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 25-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 19-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 05-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 22-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 08-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 18-Dec-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 04-Dec-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 10-Nov-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 16-Oct-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 11-Sep-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 08-Aug-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 18-Jul-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 26-Jun-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 24-Apr-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 06-Mar-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 06-Feb-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 16-Jan-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 19-Dec-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 28-Nov-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 18-Oct-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 20-Sep-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 23-Aug-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 19-Jul-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 20-Jun-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 09-May-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 04-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 01-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 02-Feb-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 05-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 01-Dec-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 20-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 29-Sep-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 21-Aug-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 20-Jul-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 08-Jun-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 13-Apr-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 02-Mar-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 20-Jan-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 16-Dec-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 04-Nov-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 16-Sep-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 22-Jul-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 06-May-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 03-Mar-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 23-Dec-2021

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 08-Oct-2021

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  56. 27-Aug-2021

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  57. 25-Jun-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  58. 12-Mar-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  59. 17-Dec-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  60. 15-Oct-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  61. 27-Aug-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  62. 16-Jul-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  63. 30-Apr-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  64. 06-Feb-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  65. 28-Nov-2019

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  66. 12-Sep-2019

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  67. 17-Jun-2019

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  68. 15-Apr-2019

    Summons - Notice

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  69. 18-Mar-2019

    Summons - Notice

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  70. 25-Feb-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  71. 25-Jan-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 20/2019 Court Decision: The court dismissed the petitioners' (Chanchalben and her sons) suit for declaration of ownership and partition of ancestral agricultural land in Kahanva village, Jambusur taluka, Bharuch district. The court found that the petitioners failed to prove their claims regarding inheritance rights to a 1/3 share in property allegedly belonging to Raysang Ramsang Parmar, as the division of ancestral property was allegedly done orally without documented evidence. Key Reasoning: The petitioners could not establish the ancestral property's ownership, the claimed oral partition, or their 1/3 inheritance share through credible evidence. The court noted missing necessary parties to the suit and concluded that without proper pleadings and substantiation regarding the property's division, the claim for judicial declaration and possession could not succeed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case