Government of Gujarat vs SHANKARDASSING DARSHANSING SHIKH — 2878/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,381,447,114. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH050030012022

Filing Number

2878/2022

Filing Date

25-Jul-2022

Registration No

2878/2022

Registration Date

25-Jul-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, VAGRA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

172

Police Station

DAHEJ MARINE POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,381,447,114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHANKARDASSING DARSHANSING SHIKH

  2. 2.SUKHBIRSING AVTAR SING SHIKH

  3. 3.SUKHMANSING SANTOKSINH SING SHIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Judegement

    Summary: Case 2878/2022 - Government of Gujarat v. Shankardassing Darshansing Shikh and Others The court acquitted all three accused of theft charges under IPC Sections 379, 381, 447, and 114. The prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence linking the accused to the alleged theft of copper materials worth approximately ₹36,000 from Birla Copper Company's plant in Vagra. Critical witness testimonies and physical evidence lacked credibility and corroboration, making the case against the accused unconvincing beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 30-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 08-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 18-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 31-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 17-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 21-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 16-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 19-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 26-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 29-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 01-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 10-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 12-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 15-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 02-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 04-Apr-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 07-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 08-Feb-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 11-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 14-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 09-Nov-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 12-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 02-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 04-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 17-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 20-May-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 13-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 23-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 04-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 14-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 10-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 08-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 11-Oct-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 23-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 25-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2878/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 2878/2022 - Government of Gujarat v. Shankardassing Darshansing Shikh and Others The court acquitted all three accused of theft charges under IPC Sections 379, 381, 447, and 114. The prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence linking the accused to the alleged theft of copper materials worth approximately ₹36,000 from Birla Copper Company's plant in Vagra. Critical witness testimonies and physical evidence lacked credibility and corroboration, making the case against the accused unconvincing beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case