JUBEDABEN MAKBUL KAZI vs RUKAIYABEN ISMAIL UMARSHA Advocate - H I SHAH — 45/2021

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Defendant Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Issues

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Issues

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Issues

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Issues

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Issues

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Order On Injuction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Order On Injuction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Order On Injuction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

OrderView PDF

Summary of Case 45/2021 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for interim injunction seeking to restrain defendants from transferring agricultural property in Pakhajan village, Bharuch district. The plaintiffs claimed their ancestor's name was omitted from revenue records during a 1999 mutation entry, and subsequently challenged a 2020 registered sale deed to defendant no. 10. The court found that defendant no. 10, as a bona fide purchaser through a registered instrument executed before the suit was filed, had acquired valid title. The court also held that the plaintiffs' 17-year delay in asserting rights after their ancestor's death, combined with the registered nature of the sale deed, precluded granting the equitable relief of injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Order On Injuction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Order On Injuction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Order On Injuction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Order On Injuction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Hearing On Injunction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Hearing On Injunction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Hearing On Injunction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Hearing On Injunction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Hearing On Injunction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Hearing On Injunction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Hearing On Injunction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Hearing On Injunction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Hearing On Injunction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Hearing On Injunction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Hearing On Injunction Application

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

For Counter Affidavit

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Written Statement/Reply

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Summons - Notice

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Summons - Notice

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 45/2021