JUBEDABEN MAKBUL KAZI vs RUKAIYABEN ISMAIL UMARSHA Advocate - H I SHAH — 45/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBH050019102021
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
45/2021
Filing Date
15-11-2021
Registration No
45/2021
Registration Date
15-11-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, VAGRA
Judge
1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JUBEDABEN MAKBUL KAZI
Adv. F.A.MOTIWALA
AIYUB MAKBUL DIWAN
FARIDABEN ABDULAZIZ DIWAN
YUSUF MAKBUL DIWAN
MARIYAMBANU AKBARBHAI DIWAN
SAEDABEN MAKBULBHAI KAZI
SHABBIR MAKBUL KAZI
Respondent(s)
RUKAIYABEN ISMAIL UMARSHA Advocate - H I SHAH
NIZAMUDDIN ISMAIL UMARSHA
Adv. H I SHAH
YUNUS ISMAIL UMARSHA
Adv. H I SHAH
MAIYUDDIN ISMAIL UMARSHA
Adv. H I SHAH
SAHERABEN ISMAIL UMARSHA
Adv. H I SHAH
AHMAD HUSAINSHA
Adv. H I SHAH
IBRAHIMSHA HAJRATSHA DIWAN
Adv. H I SHAH
RABIYABIBI HAJRATSHA DIWAN
Adv. H I SHAH
HASINABIBI HAJRATSHA DIWAN
Adv. H I SHAH
RAJENDRA NARANBHAI PATEL
Adv. H I SHAH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 20-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 16-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 16-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 19-01-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 45/2021 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for interim injunction seeking to restrain defendants from transferring agricultural property in Pakhajan village, Bharuch district. The plaintiffs claimed their ancestor's name was omitted from revenue records during a 1999 mutation entry, and subsequently challenged a 2020 registered sale deed to defendant no. 10. The court found that defendant no. 10, as a bona fide purchaser through a registered instrument executed before the suit was filed, had acquired valid title. The court also held that the plaintiffs' 17-year delay in asserting rights after their ancestor's death, combined with the registered nature of the sale deed, precluded granting the equitable relief of injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 45/2021 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for interim injunction seeking to restrain defendants from transferring agricultural property in Pakhajan village, Bharuch district. The plaintiffs claimed their ancestor's name was omitted from revenue records during a 1999 mutation entry, and subsequently challenged a 2020 registered sale deed to defendant no. 10. The court found that defendant no. 10, as a bona fide purchaser through a registered instrument executed before the suit was filed, had acquired valid title. The court also held that the plaintiffs' 17-year delay in asserting rights after their ancestor's death, combined with the registered nature of the sale deed, precluded granting the equitable relief of injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts