GOHIL RATILAL GALABBHAI vs TALATI CUM MANTRI RAHIYAD — 36/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 39,34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBH050016912025
Filing Number
36/2025
Filing Date
04-Aug-2025
Registration No
36/2025
Registration Date
04-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VAGRA
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOHIL RATILAL GALABBHAI
Adv. R D DESAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.TALATI CUM MANTRI RAHIYAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: Gohil Ratilal Galabbhai v. Talati Cum Mantri Rahiyad (36/2025) Decision: The court allowed the plaintiff's suit for declaration, holding that his wife Savitaben Ratilal Gohil, missing since 28 December 2014 (11+ years), shall be presumed dead under law. The court directed authorities to issue a death certificate to facilitate property succession. Key Reasoning: The plaintiff satisfied the legal burden by proving his wife disappeared over seven years ago, he made reasonable tracing efforts (police complaint filed), and no contrary evidence existed. Applying Sections 110-111 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 and precedent law, the court found the statutory presumption of death justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2025
Case Summary: Gohil Ratilal Galabbhai v. Talati Cum Mantri Rahiyad (36/2025) Decision: The court allowed the plaintiff's suit for declaration, holding that his wife Savitaben Ratilal Gohil, missing since 28 December 2014 (11+ years), shall be presumed dead under law. The court directed authorities to issue a death certificate to facilitate property succession. Key Reasoning: The plaintiff satisfied the legal burden by proving his wife disappeared over seven years ago, he made reasonable tracing efforts (police complaint filed), and no contrary evidence existed. Applying Sections 110-111 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 and precedent law, the court found the statutory presumption of death justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts