Government of Gujarat vs SANJAY KANULA DEBNATH Advocate - S R BHATTI — 1307/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 336. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH050015272024
Filing Number
1307/2024
Filing Date
24-06-2024
Registration No
1307/2024
Registration Date
24-06-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, VAGRA
Judge
1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
402
Police Station
DAHEJ POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SANJAY KANULA DEBNATH Advocate - S R BHATTI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 29-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 03-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1307/2024 Government of Gujarat v. Sanjay Kanula Debnath (Advocate S.R. Bhatti) The court acquitted the respondent Sanjay Kanula Debnath of charges under IPC Section 255(1) and Medical Practitioners Act Sections 30 and 33, finding insufficient evidence to prove illegal medical practice. The prosecution failed to establish through credible witness testimony that the accused operated an unauthorized clinic or prescribed medicines without proper medical qualifications, as key witnesses contradicted the prosecution's allegations in their examinations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1307/2024 Government of Gujarat v. Sanjay Kanula Debnath (Advocate S.R. Bhatti) The court acquitted the respondent Sanjay Kanula Debnath of charges under IPC Section 255(1) and Medical Practitioners Act Sections 30 and 33, finding insufficient evidence to prove illegal medical practice. The prosecution failed to establish through credible witness testimony that the accused operated an unauthorized clinic or prescribed medicines without proper medical qualifications, as key witnesses contradicted the prosecution's allegations in their examinations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts