Government of Gujarat vs SANJAY KANULA DEBNATH Advocate - S R BHATTI — 1307/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 336. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH050015272024

Filing Number

1307/2024

Filing Date

24-Jun-2024

Registration No

1307/2024

Registration Date

24-Jun-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, VAGRA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

402

Police Station

DAHEJ POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 336
Gujarat Medical Practitioners Act, 1963 Section 30,33

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY KANULA DEBNATH Advocate - S R BHATTI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 1307/2024 Government of Gujarat v. Sanjay Kanula Debnath (Advocate S.R. Bhatti) The court acquitted the respondent Sanjay Kanula Debnath of charges under IPC Section 255(1) and Medical Practitioners Act Sections 30 and 33, finding insufficient evidence to prove illegal medical practice. The prosecution failed to establish through credible witness testimony that the accused operated an unauthorized clinic or prescribed medicines without proper medical qualifications, as key witnesses contradicted the prosecution's allegations in their examinations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 14-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 18-Oct-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 26-Sep-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 11-Sep-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 21-Aug-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 17-Jul-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 20-Jun-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 23-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 25-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 02-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 05-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 13-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 26-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 22-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 24-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 24-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1307/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1307/2024 Government of Gujarat v. Sanjay Kanula Debnath (Advocate S.R. Bhatti) The court acquitted the respondent Sanjay Kanula Debnath of charges under IPC Section 255(1) and Medical Practitioners Act Sections 30 and 33, finding insufficient evidence to prove illegal medical practice. The prosecution failed to establish through credible witness testimony that the accused operated an unauthorized clinic or prescribed medicines without proper medical qualifications, as key witnesses contradicted the prosecution's allegations in their examinations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case