BHARATBHAI GIRDHARBHAI vs PRABHUDAS RANCHHODBHAI MAKVANA Advocate - S R RAJPUT — 41/2024

Case Summary: RCS 41/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction and ordered costs to be paid in the cause of the suit. Key Facts: Plaintiffs claimed a 1/5th share in agricultural property in Bharuch District as heirs of Ghanuben (who predeceased in 1999). They alleged defendants fraudulently omitted her name from revenue records and later sold the entire property to defendant no. 5 via registered deed in October 2023, threatening to transfer it to third parties. Court's Reasoning: The court found plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience did not favor them, and there was insufficient evidence of irreparable loss. Since defendant no. 5 was a bona fide purchaser in possession under a registered deed, restraining him without strong proof would be improper. The court noted plaintiffs did not implead defendants 1-4 (the actual sellers) in the injunction application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.