THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ASHOKBHAI BACHUBHAI GOHIL Advocate - M Y PATEL — 767/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH050008972025

Filing Number

767/2025

Filing Date

15-Apr-2025

Registration No

767/2025

Registration Date

15-Apr-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VAGRA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

696

Police Station

WAGRA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHOKBHAI BACHUBHAI GOHIL Advocate - M Y PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 767/2025 The State of Gujarat v. Ashokbhai Bachubhai Gohil The court acquitted the respondent of drunk driving charges, finding fatal infirmities in the prosecution's case. The blood alcohol level (0.0918%) exceeded the legal limit, but the court ruled that mandatory procedural requirements under the Bombay Prohibition Rules were violated: the doctor failed to personally add anticoagulant and preservative to the blood sample as required, instead receiving a pre-prepared phial from the laboratory without proper verification. Additionally, critical investigative details—witness names and addresses—were omitted from the FIR, and only police witnesses testified rather than independent witnesses. The court held these violations vitiated the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 16-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 15-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 15-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 767/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 767/2025 The State of Gujarat v. Ashokbhai Bachubhai Gohil The court acquitted the respondent of drunk driving charges, finding fatal infirmities in the prosecution's case. The blood alcohol level (0.0918%) exceeded the legal limit, but the court ruled that mandatory procedural requirements under the Bombay Prohibition Rules were violated: the doctor failed to personally add anticoagulant and preservative to the blood sample as required, instead receiving a pre-prepared phial from the laboratory without proper verification. Additionally, critical investigative details—witness names and addresses—were omitted from the FIR, and only police witnesses testified rather than independent witnesses. The court held these violations vitiated the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case