Raj Sabnambanu D/o Haidarsaheb Bapusaheb And Wf/o Vashim Nashirkhan Chhatrasinh Malek vs HAIDARSAHEB BAPU SAHEB Advocate - J.H.KADRI — 26/2019
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,37. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBH050008492019
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
26/2019
Filing Date
29-07-2019
Registration No
26/2019
Registration Date
29-07-2019
Court
TALUKA COURT, VAGRA
Judge
1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raj Sabnambanu D/o Haidarsaheb Bapusaheb And Wf/o Vashim Nashirkhan Chhatrasinh Malek
Adv. S S DOLA
Respondent(s)
HAIDARSAHEB BAPU SAHEB Advocate - J.H.KADRI
IBRAHIM BAPU SAHEB SARANVALA
Adv. J.H.KADRI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-05-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 20-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 16-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 16-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 17-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No. 26/2019 Outcome: Plaintiff's interim injunction application rejected. The court dismissed the petition seeking to restrain defendants from entering agricultural property in Saran village and ordered costs to follow the suit. Key Issue: Plaintiff claimed ownership of disputed land based on a 1995 gift deed from her grandfather executed under Muslim personal law, but the court found insufficient evidence of a valid gift under Muhammadan law and rejected her claim to interim relief based on lack of prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 26/2019 Outcome: Plaintiff's interim injunction application rejected. The court dismissed the petition seeking to restrain defendants from entering agricultural property in Saran village and ordered costs to follow the suit. Key Issue: Plaintiff claimed ownership of disputed land based on a 1995 gift deed from her grandfather executed under Muslim personal law, but the court found insufficient evidence of a valid gift under Muhammadan law and rejected her claim to interim relief based on lack of prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts