LEGAL HEIRS OF BAHADURBHAI @ BADHARBHAI NARSINHBHAI UKABHAI PATEL(Legal Heir) vs LEGAL HEIRS OF NARSANGBHAI LALJIBHAI Advocate - . — 4/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,R4. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th March 2026.
CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU
CNR: GJBH050007542024
Filing Number
4/2024
Filing Date
18-Mar-2024
Registration No
4/2024
Registration Date
18-Mar-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, VAGRA
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LEGAL HEIRS OF BAHADURBHAI @ BADHARBHAI NARSINHBHAI UKABHAI PATEL(Legal Heir)
Adv. J H KADRI1.
-
2.BHANUBEN BADHARBHAI PATEL 1.
-
3.NIRMABEN BADHARBHAI PATEL 1.
-
4.NILESHBHAI BADHARBHAI PATEL 1.
-
5.BAKULBHAI BADHARBHAI PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.LEGAL HEIRS OF NARSANGBHAI LALJIBHAI Advocate - .
-
2.UDESING NARSANGBHAI
Adv. V D ROHIT
-
3.LEGAL HEIRS OF BHARATABHAI NARSANGBHAI(Legal Heir)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 4/2024 Summary: The court allowed the restoration application of Civil Suit No. 93/2011, which had been dismissed for default in 2022 due to the plaintiffs' absence. The court adopted a liberal approach, finding the plaintiffs' explanations for the five-month delay reasonable (unaware of dismissal, residing outside village, unfamiliar with legal procedures) and determined that denying restoration would irreparably harm their right to merits-based adjudication of the property dispute. The suit was restored subject to the condition that plaintiffs deposit Rs. 5,000 as costs within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2025
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Nov-2025
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Nov-2025
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Sep-2025
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Aug-2025
Final Arguments
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jul-2025
Final Arguments
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jun-2025
Final Arguments
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Apr-2025
Final Arguments
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2025
Final Arguments
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Feb-2025
Final Arguments
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Feb-2025
Final Arguments
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Dec-2024
Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Dec-2024
Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Oct-2024
Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Oct-2024
Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Sep-2024
Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jul-2024
Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jun-2024
Notice To Opponents
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Apr-2024
Notice To Opponents
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2024
Case 4/2024 Summary: The court allowed the restoration application of Civil Suit No. 93/2011, which had been dismissed for default in 2022 due to the plaintiffs' absence. The court adopted a liberal approach, finding the plaintiffs' explanations for the five-month delay reasonable (unaware of dismissal, residing outside village, unfamiliar with legal procedures) and determined that denying restoration would irreparably harm their right to merits-based adjudication of the property dispute. The suit was restored subject to the condition that plaintiffs deposit Rs. 5,000 as costs within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts