INDRAJITSINH MULTANSINH RATHOD vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT — 34/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJBH050007512026

Case disposed

Filing Number

34/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

34/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VAGRA

Judge

1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1199035250310

Police Station

DAHEJ MARINE POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

INDRAJITSINH MULTANSINH RATHOD

Adv. S R BHATTI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

ORDER/JUDGEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: CRMA No. 34/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Vagra, Bharuch rejected the bail application of Indrajitsinh Multansinh Rathod under Section 480 BNSS. The accused, arrested on 06-03-2026 in connection with FIR No. 310/2025 involving charges of theft and receiving stolen goods, argued he was falsely implicated and posed no flight risk. However, the court found apprehension of hindrance to investigation and high risk of accused absconding, thereby denying bail to prevent witness intimidation and trial delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA No. 34/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Vagra, Bharuch rejected the bail application of Indrajitsinh Multansinh Rathod under Section 480 BNSS. The accused, arrested on 06-03-2026 in connection with FIR No. 310/2025 involving charges of theft and receiving stolen goods, argued he was falsely implicated and posed no flight risk. However, the court found apprehension of hindrance to investigation and high risk of accused absconding, thereby denying bail to prevent witness intimidation and trial delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VAGRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case