Government of Gujarat vs MAHESHBHAI BALUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S R BHATTI — 58/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,81,98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH050001162025
Filing Number
58/2025
Filing Date
05-02-2025
Registration No
58/2025
Registration Date
05-02-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VAGRA
Judge
1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
745
Police Station
WAGRA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MAHESHBHAI BALUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S R BHATTI
LAKHIBEN MUKESHBHAI SHANTILAL RATHOD
Adv. S R BHATTI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 20-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 12-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 58/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused Maheshbhai Balubhai Vasava and Lakhiben Mukeshbhai Shantilal Rathod of charges under the Prohibition Act (Sections 65(a)(a), 81, 98(2)), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found critical gaps in the investigation and prosecution evidence: the FIR lacked specific details (time of tip-off, vehicle used, panchas' full names), the independent witnesses (panchas) provided no substantive corroboration despite signing the seizure memo, and the police relied entirely on official witnesses without gathering independent testimony despite the public location of the offense. The court concluded the prosecution's case was insufficient and granted the accused benefit of doubt under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 58/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused Maheshbhai Balubhai Vasava and Lakhiben Mukeshbhai Shantilal Rathod of charges under the Prohibition Act (Sections 65(a)(a), 81, 98(2)), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found critical gaps in the investigation and prosecution evidence: the FIR lacked specific details (time of tip-off, vehicle used, panchas' full names), the independent witnesses (panchas) provided no substantive corroboration despite signing the seizure memo, and the police relied entirely on official witnesses without gathering independent testimony despite the public location of the offense. The court concluded the prosecution's case was insufficient and granted the accused benefit of doubt under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts