Government of Gujarat vs MAHESHBHAI BALUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S R BHATTI — 58/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,81,98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH050001162025

Case disposed

Filing Number

58/2025

Filing Date

05-02-2025

Registration No

58/2025

Registration Date

05-02-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VAGRA

Judge

1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

745

Police Station

WAGRA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA,81,98(2)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

MAHESHBHAI BALUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S R BHATTI

LAKHIBEN MUKESHBHAI SHANTILAL RATHOD

Adv. S R BHATTI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

30-04-2026

Disposed

17-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

20-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

12-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

19-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

30-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 58/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused Maheshbhai Balubhai Vasava and Lakhiben Mukeshbhai Shantilal Rathod of charges under the Prohibition Act (Sections 65(a)(a), 81, 98(2)), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found critical gaps in the investigation and prosecution evidence: the FIR lacked specific details (time of tip-off, vehicle used, panchas' full names), the independent witnesses (panchas) provided no substantive corroboration despite signing the seizure memo, and the police relied entirely on official witnesses without gathering independent testimony despite the public location of the offense. The court concluded the prosecution's case was insufficient and granted the accused benefit of doubt under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 58/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused Maheshbhai Balubhai Vasava and Lakhiben Mukeshbhai Shantilal Rathod of charges under the Prohibition Act (Sections 65(a)(a), 81, 98(2)), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found critical gaps in the investigation and prosecution evidence: the FIR lacked specific details (time of tip-off, vehicle used, panchas' full names), the independent witnesses (panchas) provided no substantive corroboration despite signing the seizure memo, and the police relied entirely on official witnesses without gathering independent testimony despite the public location of the offense. The court concluded the prosecution's case was insufficient and granted the accused benefit of doubt under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VAGRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case