LEGAL HEIRS OF PUJIBEN MATHURABHAI RATHOD(Legal Heir) vs BAJUBEN W/O PARASHOTTAMBHAI MATHURBHAI Advocate - S J PATEL — 93/2012

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBH050001002012

Case disposed

Filing Number

93/2012

Filing Date

02-11-2012

Registration No

93/2012

Registration Date

02-11-2012

Court

TALUKA COURT, VAGRA

Judge

1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

LEGAL HEIRS OF PUJIBEN MATHURABHAI RATHOD(Legal Heir)

Adv. N.R.PARMAR1.

MANGALBHAI MATHURBHAI RATHOD 1.

MADHUBEN MATHURBHAI RATHOD 1.

RAIJIBHAI MATHURBHAI RATHOD 1.

BHAILAL MATHURBHAI RATHOD 1.

KAPILA MATHURBHAI RATHOD

MANGALBHAI MATHURBHAI RATHOD

Adv. N R PARMAR

Respondent(s)

BAJUBEN W/O PARASHOTTAMBHAI MATHURBHAI Advocate - S J PATEL

RAJUBHAI PARSHOTTAMBHAI RATHO

Adv. S.J.PATEL

DAHIBEN PARASOTTAMBHAI RATHOD

Adv. S.J.PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

07-04-2026

Disposed

20-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

16-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

02-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

24-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT
07-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 93/2012 The Additional Civil Judge at Vagra, Bharuch rejected the plaintiffs' suit seeking declaration of ownership and permanent injunction over ancestral agricultural land. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove the property was joint family property and that the suit was barred by limitation, having been filed in 2012 over 26 years after the initial mutation entry in 1986 without explanation for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

03-03-2016
ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 93/2012 The Additional Civil Judge at Vagra, Bharuch rejected the plaintiffs' suit seeking declaration of ownership and permanent injunction over ancestral agricultural land. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove the property was joint family property and that the suit was barred by limitation, having been filed in 2012 over 26 years after the initial mutation entry in 1986 without explanation for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VAGRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case