PRABHUBEN D/O MOHANSINH HIMATSINH vs JASHAVANTSINH MOHANSINH RAJ Advocate - P.A.SINDHA — 73/2015

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,37. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBH050000762015

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

Filing Number

73/2015

Filing Date

21-06-2013

Registration No

73/2015

Registration Date

21-06-2013

Court

TALUKA COURT, VAGRA

Judge

1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 34,37

Petitioner(s)

PRABHUBEN D/O MOHANSINH HIMATSINH

Adv. S.I.DOLA

KANUBEN D/O MOHANSINH HIMATSINH RAJ

Adv. S.I.DOLA

MANUBEN D/O MOHANSINH HIMANTSINH RAJ

Adv. S.I.DOLA

NIRUBEN D/O MOHANSINH HIMANTSINH RAJ

Adv. S.I.DOLA

BHAGVATIBEN D/O MOHANSINH HIMANTSINH RAJ(Legal Heir)

Adv. S.I.DOLA5.

Jaydipsinh Dilipsinh 5.

Heenaben Dilipsinh Parmar 5.

Manishaben Dilipsinh Parmar

Respondent(s)

JASHAVANTSINH MOHANSINH RAJ Advocate - P.A.SINDHA

DILAVARSINH MOHANSINH RAJ

Adv. J H KADRI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

02-06-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

26-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

04-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

13-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

16-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

30-09-2015
ORDER

Summary of Case 73/2015 Petitioners: Prabhuben, Kanuben, and Manuben (daughters of Mohansinh Himatsinh Raj) Respondents: Jashavantsinh Mohansinh Raj and Dilavarsinh Mohansinh Raj Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case for the relief sought. The properties in dispute (Lots A and B) had been properly partitioned among the legal heirs through a partition deed executed in 1992 with the consent of all parties. The respondents' possession and recording in revenue records were deemed valid. The court held that the petitioners' claim lacked merit as the partition was executed when the mother was alive and in sound health, and no will or legal document contradicted the partition arrangement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 73/2015 Petitioners: Prabhuben, Kanuben, and Manuben (daughters of Mohansinh Himatsinh Raj) Respondents: Jashavantsinh Mohansinh Raj and Dilavarsinh Mohansinh Raj Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case for the relief sought. The properties in dispute (Lots A and B) had been properly partitioned among the legal heirs through a partition deed executed in 1992 with the consent of all parties. The respondents' possession and recording in revenue records were deemed valid. The court held that the petitioners' claim lacked merit as the partition was executed when the mother was alive and in sound health, and no will or legal document contradicted the partition arrangement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VAGRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case