The State vs RAJENDRABHAI PARBHUBHAI PATEL — 285/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040003442026

Filing Number

285/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

285/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250636

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRABHAI PARBHUBHAI PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: 285/2026 - The State v. Rajendrabhai Parbhubhai Patel The court convicted the respondent Rajendrabhai Parbhubhai Patel under BNS Section 264 for charges filed under IPC Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1), after the accused voluntarily admitted guilt. Considering the accused's lack of criminal history, family circumstances, economic condition, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a sentence lighter than the statutory minimum—time served in custody plus a fine of ₹100, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 285/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 285/2026 - The State v. Rajendrabhai Parbhubhai Patel The court convicted the respondent Rajendrabhai Parbhubhai Patel under BNS Section 264 for charges filed under IPC Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1), after the accused voluntarily admitted guilt. Considering the accused's lack of criminal history, family circumstances, economic condition, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a sentence lighter than the statutory minimum—time served in custody plus a fine of ₹100, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case