The State vs ATULBHAI JIGNESHBHAI RATHOD — 283/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040003422026

Filing Number

283/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

283/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250626

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ATULBHAI JIGNESHBHAI RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Order

    Summary of Case 283/2026 The court convicted respondent ATULBHAI JIGNESHBHAI RATHOD under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(B) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the accused's clean criminal record, family circumstances, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lesser sentence than the statutory minimum: a fine of ₹1,000 (with 2 days simple imprisonment as default), rather than applying the mandatory minimum punishment provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 283/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 283/2026 The court convicted respondent ATULBHAI JIGNESHBHAI RATHOD under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(B) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the accused's clean criminal record, family circumstances, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lesser sentence than the statutory minimum: a fine of ₹1,000 (with 2 days simple imprisonment as default), rather than applying the mandatory minimum punishment provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case