The State vs SHAILESHBHAI BHAILALBHAI RATHOD — 281/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040003402026

Filing Number

281/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

281/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250634

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 661(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAILESHBHAI BHAILALBHAI RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Shaileshbhai Bhailalbhai Rathod (281/2026) The court found the accused guilty under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act and Section 66(1)B of the Prohibition Act after the accused voluntarily confessed. Considering the accused's clean record, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a fine of ₹1,000 (with 2 days simple imprisonment as default) instead of the statutory minimum sentence, citing judicial precedent permitting reduced sentences in appropriate circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 281/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Shaileshbhai Bhailalbhai Rathod (281/2026) The court found the accused guilty under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act and Section 66(1)B of the Prohibition Act after the accused voluntarily confessed. Considering the accused's clean record, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a fine of ₹1,000 (with 2 days simple imprisonment as default) instead of the statutory minimum sentence, citing judicial precedent permitting reduced sentences in appropriate circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case