The State vs PRITESHBHAI MUKESHBHAI RATHOD — 280/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040003392026

Filing Number

280/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

280/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250524

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRITESHBHAI MUKESHBHAI RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: 280/2026 - The State v. Priteshbhai Mukeshbhai Rathod The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 264 (relevant to the charges under IT Act Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1)) after he voluntarily confessed to the offence. Considering the accused's clean criminal record, family circumstances, economic situation, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a sentence less than the statutory minimum—imprisonment till rising of court plus a fine of ₹100, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 280/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 280/2026 - The State v. Priteshbhai Mukeshbhai Rathod The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 264 (relevant to the charges under IT Act Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1)) after he voluntarily confessed to the offence. Considering the accused's clean criminal record, family circumstances, economic situation, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a sentence less than the statutory minimum—imprisonment till rising of court plus a fine of ₹100, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case