The State vs VIRALBHAI MAHEDRABHAI PATEL — 279/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040003382026

Filing Number

279/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

279/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250531

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIRALBHAI MAHEDRABHAI PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Viralbhai Mahedrabhai Patel under BNS Section 264 based on his voluntary confession to charges under IPC Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1). Considering the accused's clean record, family circumstances, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a sentence of imprisonment until rising of court plus a fine of ₹100, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid—less than the statutory minimum sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 279/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Viralbhai Mahedrabhai Patel under BNS Section 264 based on his voluntary confession to charges under IPC Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1). Considering the accused's clean record, family circumstances, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a sentence of imprisonment until rising of court plus a fine of ₹100, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid—less than the statutory minimum sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case