The State vs MEHULBHAI RAKESHBHAI VASAVA — 278/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040003372026

Filing Number

278/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

278/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250546

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MEHULBHAI RAKESHBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted defendant MEHULBHAI RAKESHBHAI VASAVA under BNS Section 264 for charges filed under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1). The accused voluntarily admitted guilt; considering his clean criminal history, family circumstances, economic situation, and the precedent set in Natwar Harchand v. State, the court imposed a sentence lighter than the statutory minimum—imprisonment until court rising and a fine of ₹100, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 278/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted defendant MEHULBHAI RAKESHBHAI VASAVA under BNS Section 264 for charges filed under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1). The accused voluntarily admitted guilt; considering his clean criminal history, family circumstances, economic situation, and the precedent set in Natwar Harchand v. State, the court imposed a sentence lighter than the statutory minimum—imprisonment until court rising and a fine of ₹100, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case