BHAVNABEN DAHYABHAI PATEL W/O BHARATBHAI PATEL vs LATE LAXMIBEN D/O BHANABHAI SURTI W/O JERAMBHAI BAVJIBHAI Advocate - N V PATEL — 15/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBH040003322024

Filing Number

15/2024

Filing Date

20-Mar-2024

Registration No

15/2024

Registration Date

20-Mar-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAVNABEN DAHYABHAI PATEL W/O BHARATBHAI PATEL

    Adv. T R SHINDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LATE LAXMIBEN D/O BHANABHAI SURTI W/O JERAMBHAI BAVJIBHAI Advocate - N V PATEL

  2. 2.KAMRUDDIN ALLAUDDIN SHAIKH

    Adv. N V PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 15/2024 Summary The court dismissed the petitioner Bhavnaben Dahyabhai Patel's civil suit under CPC Section 7 Rule 11(c). The petitioner had claimed property valuation of ₹8,91,000 (documented value ₹3,00,000) and court fees of ₹22,150, but failed to properly remit court fees and provide adequate response to the respondent's counter-claim. The court rejected the petition for non-compliance with procedural requirements regarding court fee payment and filing obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  10. 24-Dec-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  11. 12-Nov-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  12. 07-Oct-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  13. 08-Sep-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  14. 18-Aug-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  15. 28-Jul-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  16. 18-Jun-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  17. 30-Apr-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  18. 26-Mar-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  19. 05-Feb-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  20. 01-Jan-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  21. 27-Nov-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  22. 23-Oct-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  23. 25-Sep-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  24. 21-Aug-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  25. 22-Jul-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  26. 19-Jun-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  27. 29-Apr-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  28. 20-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 20-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 15/2024 Summary The court dismissed the petitioner Bhavnaben Dahyabhai Patel's civil suit under CPC Section 7 Rule 11(c). The petitioner had claimed property valuation of ₹8,91,000 (documented value ₹3,00,000) and court fees of ₹22,150, but failed to properly remit court fees and provide adequate response to the respondent's counter-claim. The court rejected the petition for non-compliance with procedural requirements regarding court fee payment and filing obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case