The State vs MUKESHBHAI URFE MAHCHO ASHOKBHAI VASAVA — 272/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040003312026

Filing Number

272/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

272/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250427

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKESHBHAI URFE MAHCHO ASHOKBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Order

    The court convicted respondent Mukeshbhai Urfe Mahcho Ashokbhai Vasava under BNS Section 264 for the charges filed under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Considering the respondent's voluntary plea of guilt, clean criminal record, economic and family circumstances, and relying on precedent principles, the court imposed a lenient sentence of time already served in court plus a fine of Rs. 100, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 272/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Mukeshbhai Urfe Mahcho Ashokbhai Vasava under BNS Section 264 for the charges filed under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Considering the respondent's voluntary plea of guilt, clean criminal record, economic and family circumstances, and relying on precedent principles, the court imposed a lenient sentence of time already served in court plus a fine of Rs. 100, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case