The State vs MITULBHAI KISHORBHAI VASAVA — 270/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040003292026

Filing Number

270/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

270/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250523

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MITULBHAI KISHORBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Order

    The court convicted respondent Mitulbhai Kishorbhai Vasava under BNS Section 264 for charges under IPC Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense. Considering the accused's clean criminal history, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and relying on the High Court's principle in Natwar Harchand v. State that courts can impose sentences less than the statutory minimum in appropriate circumstances, the court imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment until rising of court plus a fine of ₹100, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 270/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Mitulbhai Kishorbhai Vasava under BNS Section 264 for charges under IPC Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense. Considering the accused's clean criminal history, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and relying on the High Court's principle in Natwar Harchand v. State that courts can impose sentences less than the statutory minimum in appropriate circumstances, the court imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment until rising of court plus a fine of ₹100, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case