The State vs KAMLABEN DASHRATHBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 147/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040002052026

Filing Number

147/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

147/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250515

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMLABEN DASHRATHBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: 147/2026 The State vs. KAMLABEN DASHRATHBHAI VASAVA Decision: The court convicted the accused under BNS Section 264 for the charged offense. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, clean criminal record, economic circumstances, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of Rs. 50, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default punishment. The seized contraband (liquor) was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 147/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 147/2026 The State vs. KAMLABEN DASHRATHBHAI VASAVA Decision: The court convicted the accused under BNS Section 264 for the charged offense. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, clean criminal record, economic circumstances, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of Rs. 50, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default punishment. The seized contraband (liquor) was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case