The State vs MANGIBEN W/O RAMESHBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 146/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH040002042026
Filing Number
146/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
146/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, HANSOT
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199024250540
Police Station
HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MANGIBEN W/O RAMESHBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 264 (liquor offense) after she voluntarily confessed to the crime. Considering her clean criminal record, family circumstances, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a reduced sentence of ₹50 fine instead of the minimum statutory penalty, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default. The seized liquor was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 264 (liquor offense) after she voluntarily confessed to the crime. Considering her clean criminal record, family circumstances, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a reduced sentence of ₹50 fine instead of the minimum statutory penalty, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default. The seized liquor was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts