The State vs MINABEN W/O RAJUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 145/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040002032026

Filing Number

145/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

145/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250536

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MINABEN W/O RAJUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case 145/2026 Summary: The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 264 (liquor offense) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the accused's clean record, financial circumstances, family responsibilities, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of ₹50, with two days simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. The seized liquor was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 145/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 145/2026 Summary: The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 264 (liquor offense) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the accused's clean record, financial circumstances, family responsibilities, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of ₹50, with two days simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. The seized liquor was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case