The State vs KARIBEN WD/O UKKADBHAI BECHARBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 115/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040001702026

Case disposed

Filing Number

115/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

115/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250439

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

The State

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KARIBEN WD/O UKKADBHAI BECHARBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

26-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: 115/2026 The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 264 (liquor-related offense) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charge. Considering the accused's clean criminal history, family circumstances, economic situation, and voluntary admission, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 50 fine instead of the statutory minimum punishment, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The seized liquor was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 115/2026 The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 264 (liquor-related offense) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charge. Considering the accused's clean criminal history, family circumstances, economic situation, and voluntary admission, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 50 fine instead of the statutory minimum punishment, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The seized liquor was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case