The State vs MOHSIN USMAN MUJAD — 114/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040001692026

Filing Number

114/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

114/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250612

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHSIN USMAN MUJAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case 114/2026 Summary The court found respondent Mohsin Usman Mujad guilty under BNS Section 264 (liquor offense) after he voluntarily confessed. Considering his clean record, family circumstances, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 50 fine instead of the statutory minimum, with 2 days simple imprisonment as alternative if fine remains unpaid, and ordered destruction of seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 114/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 114/2026 Summary The court found respondent Mohsin Usman Mujad guilty under BNS Section 264 (liquor offense) after he voluntarily confessed. Considering his clean record, family circumstances, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 50 fine instead of the statutory minimum, with 2 days simple imprisonment as alternative if fine remains unpaid, and ordered destruction of seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case