The State vs UKDIBEN D/O LALLUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 112/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040001672026

Filing Number

112/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

112/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250582

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UKDIBEN D/O LALLUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case 112/2026 Summary The defendant was charged under Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) and voluntarily confessed to the offense. The court, considering the defendant's clean criminal history, voluntary confession, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and applying the principle from *Natwar Harchand v. State*, imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum. The defendant was convicted under BNS Section 264 and sentenced to a fine of ₹50, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default, and ordered confiscation and destruction of the seized contraband alcohol. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 112/2026 Summary The defendant was charged under Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) and voluntarily confessed to the offense. The court, considering the defendant's clean criminal history, voluntary confession, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and applying the principle from *Natwar Harchand v. State*, imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum. The defendant was convicted under BNS Section 264 and sentenced to a fine of ₹50, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default, and ordered confiscation and destruction of the seized contraband alcohol. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case