The State vs UKDIBEN D/O LALLUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 112/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH040001672026
Filing Number
112/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
112/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, HANSOT
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199024250582
Police Station
HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
UKDIBEN D/O LALLUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 26-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 112/2026 Summary The defendant was charged under Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) and voluntarily confessed to the offense. The court, considering the defendant's clean criminal history, voluntary confession, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and applying the principle from *Natwar Harchand v. State*, imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum. The defendant was convicted under BNS Section 264 and sentenced to a fine of ₹50, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default, and ordered confiscation and destruction of the seized contraband alcohol. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 112/2026 Summary The defendant was charged under Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) and voluntarily confessed to the offense. The court, considering the defendant's clean criminal history, voluntary confession, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and applying the principle from *Natwar Harchand v. State*, imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum. The defendant was convicted under BNS Section 264 and sentenced to a fine of ₹50, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default, and ordered confiscation and destruction of the seized contraband alcohol. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts